Merck’s KEYNOTE-689 Trial Shows KEYTRUDA Significantly Improves Event-Free Survival in Head and Neck Cancer

Landmark Results Presented at AACR 2025

Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside the U.S. and Canada, has announced encouraging results from its Phase 3 KEYNOTE-689 trial. The study evaluates KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab), Merck’s anti-PD-1 therapy, as a perioperative treatment for patients with stage III or IVA resectable, locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC).

For the first time, researchers presented the data during a Plenary Session at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting 2025, where it was also selected for the AACR press program.

KEYTRUDA Significantly Improves Event-Free Survival

Following a median follow-up of 38.3 months, KEYTRUDA, when used in a perioperative setting (before and after surgery), significantly reduced the risk of event-free survival (EFS) events:

  • 34% reduction in the CPS ≥10 population (HR=0.66; p=0.0022)
  • 30% reduction in the CPS ≥1 population (HR=0.70; p=0.0014)
  • 27% reduction in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (HR=0.73; p=0.0041)

Patients in the KEYTRUDA plus standard of care (SOC) group showed markedly longer median EFS compared to those receiving SOC alone:

  • CPS ≥10: 59.7 months vs. 26.9 months
  • CPS ≥1: 59.7 months vs. 29.6 months
  • ITT: 51.8 months vs. 30.4 months
Also Read |  70-Year-Old Zika Patient Recovers in Gujarat; Health Officials Intensify Surveillance

Breakthrough in Head and Neck Cancer Treatment

Dr. Ravindra Uppaluri, co-principal investigator and Director of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, emphasized the importance of these results, calling KEYNOTE-689 the first positive trial in over two decades for this patient population.

Dr. Douglas Adkins, also a co-principal investigator from Washington University School of Medicine, highlighted the clinical significance of these findings, stating that this is the first time an anti-PD-1 therapy has improved EFS in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings for earlier-stage head and neck cancer.

Major Pathological Response (mPR) Rates Also Improved

As per the Merck Press release, the study also met a key secondary endpoint, showing statistically significant improvements in major pathological response (mPR):

  • CPS ≥10: 13.7% improvement (p<0.00001)
  • CPS ≥1: 9.8% improvement (p<0.00001)
  • ITT: 9.3% improvement (p<0.00001)

Promising Overall Survival Trends

Although the overall survival (OS) benefit did not reach statistical significance at this interim analysis, there was a positive trend in the CPS ≥10 group (HR=0.72). Formal OS testing in the CPS ≥1 and ITT groups will occur during the next analysis phase due to the hierarchical design of the study.

Also Read |  Novo Nordisk Partners with Apollo Clinics to Launch Obesity Management Program in India

Regulatory Progress and Future Outlook

A supplemental Biologics License Application (sBLA) for KEYTRUDA, based on the KEYNOTE-689 results, is currently under priority review by the U.S. FDA, with a PDUFA date of June 23, 2025. Dr. Marjorie Green, SVP and Head of Oncology at Merck Research Laboratories, noted that this marks the 12th positive pivotal trial for a KEYTRUDA-based regimen in earlier-stage cancers.

About the KEYNOTE-689 Study Design

KEYNOTE-689 is a randomized, open-label, active-controlled Phase 3 trial (NCT03765918) involving 714 treatment-naïve patients with newly diagnosed, resectable stage III or IVA LA-HNSCC. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to one of two arms:

  • Experimental arm: Neoadjuvant KEYTRUDA (200 mg IV Q3W, 2 cycles) before surgery, followed by:
    • KEYTRUDA (200 mg IV Q3W, 15 cycles) + SOC radiotherapy with cisplatin (for high-risk patients)
    • or KEYTRUDA + SOC radiotherapy without cisplatin (for low-risk patients)
  • Control arm: No neoadjuvant treatment, followed by:
    • SOC radiotherapy with cisplatin (for high-risk patients)
    • or SOC radiotherapy without cisplatin (for low-risk patients)
Also Read |  New Indian Study Reveals High Levels of Internalized Weight Bias Among Bariatric Surgery Seekers

The primary endpoint was EFS, while secondary endpoints included OS, mPR, pathological complete response, and safety. PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) was used for subgroup analysis.

Safety Profile Remains Consistent

The safety profile of KEYTRUDA aligned with previous studies. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in:

  • 44.6% of patients in the KEYTRUDA + SOC group
  • 42.9% in the SOC-alone group

TRAEs led to death in 1.1% of patients on the KEYTRUDA regimen (n=4) and 0.3% in the SOC group (n=1). Importantly, no new safety signals emerged. Immune-mediated AEs of any grade appeared in 43.2% of KEYTRUDA patients, with hypothyroidism (24.7%) being the most frequent.